23 Jan 2012

Who Gets Abortions?

Screen_shot_2012-01-23_at_2
Today is the 39th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion, commonly known as Roe v. Wade. I knew I wanted to write about abortion today, and so have been doing some research. The research has gripped me. You see, I consider abortion as the taking of a human life, and so learning how many of those human lives are interrupted each year has been sobering.

According to the Guttmacher Institute (http://web.archive.org/web/20080313054435/http://www.guttmacher.org/in-the-know/incidence.html ) 46 million abortions occur yearly, worldwide. I can’t wrap my mind around 46 million, so I’ll focus on the U.S., in which 3400 occur every day.

And who are those 3400 women? 41 percent are white, 32 percent are black, and 20 percent are Hispanic. Woman for woman, though, more blacks and Hispanics have abortions, compared with white women. For every 1000 white American women, 13 have an abortion each year, whereas black women have 49 per 1000, and Hispanics have 33 per 1000. The Guttmacher Institute (http://web.archive.org/web/20080311171704/http://www.guttmacher.org/in-the-know/characteristics.html) concludes, “Over time, women having abortions have become increasingly likely to be poor, nonwhite and unmarried, and to already have one or more children.”

If you take a group of 45-year-old American women, who have reached the age when the likelihood of pregnancy is small, one out of three will have had an abortion. A lot of those women regret that abortion, and I ache for them. 

3 Sep 2011

Who Controls What Gets Published?

Screen_shot_2011-09-03_at_6
I’ve been thinking about the British Journal of Psychiatry article I wrote about yesterday, which outlines the increased risk of mental health problems in women who choose abortions. Specifically, I’ve been wondering why it wasn’t published in America. The author is American, works in Ohio, and 15 of the 22 studies included in her meta-analysis were done in America. Around 1.2 million abortions are performed in America each year, so surely the message needs to get to the U.S. medical community, and then to trickle down to the women they are advising, that abortion doesn’t relieve emotional stress, at least in the long term.

I say I’m wondering, but I’m really not. As I wrote yesterday, abortion is a highly politicized topic in America. That politicization (I guess that is a word) extends into the hallways of academic medicine. I don’t know whether Priscilla Coleman, PhD, the author of the paper, tried to get it published in America before she sent it to Britain, but I highly suspect she tried, and tried hard.

The British Journal of Psychiatry is a highly respected medical journal, worldwide, and, before a paper can get published in it, “peer reviewers” must read it and make sure the science is reliable. The same is true of the best journals in America, but unfortunately these peer reviewers can act as gate-keepers, keeping out good science that doesn’t fit with their philosophical bent. 

But it’s timely that Dr. Coleman’s study was published in Britain just now. Hotly debated in Parliament is a proposal to require a woman seeking an abortion to receive independent counseling first. You would think abortion providers would be happy to have women receive counsel on the risks and benefits of abortion beforehand, but you would think wrong. The member of Parliament who proposed it, Nadine Dorries, apparently has been receiving “constant vilification and near-daily death threats” over her stance on abortion. There is something seriously wrong, here.

If most abortions are performed, as I believe they are, to avoid emotional distress, then the news that they do not needs to be made public, and needs to be widely discussed.

 

2 Sep 2011

Abortion and Mental Health

Screen_shot_2011-09-02_at_3
Is there an association between abortion and mental health? This question has been hotly debated, with pro-abortion advocates saying that women feel relief when they end an unwanted pregnancy. Yet research doesn’t bear this out. Just published in the British Journal of Psychiatry is a compilation of 22 studies that have been published in medical journals between 1995 and 2009, representing 877,000 women, of whom 163,000 had an abortion history. In medicine we call such a compilation a “meta-analysis”, something that is more accurate than a single research study. 

This meta-analysis shows that women are more likely to be troubled after an abortion than are women who have not had an abortion.

In fact, women with an abortion history have an 81 percent increased risk for mental health problems. The studies break down the various types of mental health problems:

·      Anxiety disorders – 34 percent increased risk.

·      Depression – 37 percent increased risk

·      Alcohol abuse – 110 percent increased risk

·      Marijuana use – 220 percent increased risk

·      Suicide attempt – 155 percent increased risk

And what about comparing not just women “with” and “without” history of abortion? That is, what about comparing women with an abortion history with women who carried an unintended pregnancy to term? When this meta-analysis looked at those two groups of women, the women who chose abortion had a 55 percent increased risk of mental health problems.

Talking about abortion is so politicized in America, it’s hard for people from different perspectives to have a rational conversation. Yet for those of us who care about women’s long-term mental health, studies like these are invaluable.

The author of the meta-analysis, Priscilla Coleman, PhD, who is a professor at Bowling Green State University in Ohio, concludes, “There are, in fact, some real risks associated with abortion that should be shared with women as they are counseled prior to an abortion.”

 

Amy Givler

Amy Givler is a family physician practicing in various settings in northeastern Louisiana. She and her husband have three nearly-grown children. Her book, Hope in the Face of Cancer: A Survival Guide for the Journey You Did Not Choose, was written to help people navigate the confusing early months of a cancer diagnosis.